randomuser.833: I would praise the day when AVs would be honest about their findings.
Not screaming "VIRUSALERT" but
"I found something that got some code and/or behavior inside, that is somehow related to the code of bad software or the behavior of potential threats I know
Options for you:
1. Quarantaine it and send it to the vendor for further research
2. Send it to the vendor flaged as false postive if you are sure about your source"
Just to find the way to false positive inform the AV vendors about false positive can be a hard thing for many vendors.
And most of the time you have to send an email. Not even the option to upload stuff.
At last some vendors answer your mail and tell you, that it is indeed a false positive and it will be fixed with the next update.
Human interaction - not that normal anymore these days...
I find you salty. Everibody tries to force or to overlook, preach or affirm something (or someone, or their pride and prejudices, directly) on someone else (who seldom do not know personally) recently. It's a bad trend in this world. But this time I think the interface trades precision (of a complete report in the immediate alert) with simplicity, thus friendliness to the "lay"/beginner user (who does not know what to think of a technical report which, I suppose, is still available further)
Speaking with someone is underrated (some big enterprises think it mainly as a cost, as it requires workforce, but it's implied pr of the best kind possible, instead. Its absence generates resentment even with minor issues, the customer feels ignored or even useless, which (s)he can't be, since it's the reason of the business, both as a purpose and as a profit). 2 is the best option (it does not exclude 1, probably they are the same, somewhat: quarantine, then get it analysed/sent. Cisco (ClamAV) does it. Avast doesn't quite fit me, but it does it too.
There
https://www.avast.com/false-positive-file-form.php