Join gamers keeping classics aliveJoin gamers keeping classics alive Become GOG Patron
checkmarkchevron-down linuxmacwindows ribbon-lvl-1 ribbon-lvl-1 ribbon-lvl-2 ribbon-lvl-2 ribbon-lvl-3 ribbon-lvl-3 sliders users-plus
avatar
delicieuxz
Profile Games Friends Reviews
Reviews
Profile Games Friends Reviews
Send a message
Invite to friendsFriend invite pending...
This user has reviewed 7 games. Awesome! You can edit your reviews directly on game pages.
Dungeon Siege
This game is no longer available in our store
Created on 28 August, 2026 10:27
Dungeon Siege

Solid game, straightforward fun

Dungeon Siege has excellent and dense atmosphere. It isn't very complex, but it is enjoyable and feels like a journey.

Heroes of Might and Magic® 2: Gold
Created on 18 December, 2025 07:20
Heroes of Might and Magic® 2: Gold

Best HoMM of the series

HoMM2 feels to me like it has superb balancing, and very refined gameplay, without any bloat or redundancy. It also has the best soundtrack of the series. Whereas I feel that HoMM3 has more stuff, sometimes unnecessarily, and that it doesn't form as flawless of a package. To me, HoMM2 is the best in the series.

STAR WARS™ Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II
This game is no longer available in our store
Created on 14 December, 2025 03:03
STAR WARS™ Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II

Best game of the series

Jedi Knight is the best game of the Dark Forces / Jedi Knight series. IMO, it also has the most authentic OG Star Wars trilogy feel to it. And it released at a time when levels had a bit of an abstract feel to them, and they're done well here, which gives this game a cool vibe.

Created on 10 April, 2025 21:58
Updated on 10 April, 2025 21:58
Warcraft II Battle.net Edition
This game is no longer available in our store
Created on 14 November, 2024 09:51
Updated on 14 November, 2024 09:59
Warcraft II Battle.net Edition

Sorely downgraded version of Warcraft II

The Battle.net version of Warcraft II was a cash-grabbing repackaging of Warcraft II and the Beyond the Dark Portal expansion. Blizzard wanted to give the game a second wind, and also wanted to cut-down on manufacturing costs. So, they cut and downgraded the sound and music materials in order to fit the base game and the expansion onto a single CD - because Blizzard was too cheap to put them on two CDs, like they originally released on. And then Blizzard put it in a small box and called it the Battle.net edition - and voila, a downgraded version of the game that sounds like it must be improved in some way. And then they sold it. You'd think that GoG would have enough self-respect, and respect for this gem of a game (which is a gem in its original form, not the B.net version), that, since they're doing a digital release that isn't restricted to the size of a single CD, they'd restore the game's music tracks and sound quality. But no, they didn't do that. GoG's version of Warcraft II features the same poorly-edited, cut-down music tracks as the B.net edition, and it features the same horrendously low-fidelity sound effects as the B.net edition. GoG's edition of Warcraft II is a lazy, careless port, and running the original game with the expansion in DOSBox provides a higher-quality experience. My advice is: Don't waste your money on it, and don't reward them with your money, since they clearly don't care about the quality of what they put out, or about doing this game justice.

3 gamers found this review helpful
Cyberia 2: Resurrection
Created on 18 May, 2015 07:50
Cyberia 2: Resurrection

First Cyberia is Amazing. Its Sequel...

The first Cyberia is a genuine PC classic which received wide praise when it released in '94. And before the GI charade was universally lauded by those who knew about it: http://www.gamespot.com/cyberia/user-reviews/2200-429246/ http://www.adventureclassicgaming.com/index.php/site/comments/39/ http://www.csoon.com/issue3/cyberia.htm http://www.giantbomb.com/cyberia/3030-18074/user-reviews/ It still holds up today as a unique and high-quality experience that very successfully blends together various genres: action, adventure, puzzle, Dragon's Lair-style arcade, flight. Cyberia 2 does not really impress on the same level as the first Cyberia, and seems much less like a serious effort: - While the first Cyberia was a pioneer in gaming technology, and also in mixing together various genres, Cyberia 2 uses the same graphics style with perhaps less overall detail than the first game, and also just mimics the same basic gameplay formula, which feels a bit more streamlined than the first game. - While the first Cyberia has an intriguing story, diverse locations, and interesting characters, Cyberia 2 feels like it was written by someone different, someone much more amateur, and who just aimed to create game time using the first game's models, rather than interesting characters, story, purpose, intrigue, etc. - The music in the first Cyberia is one of gaming history's better and most aesthetically-stylized soundtracks, and while Cyberia 2 uses the same instruments, effects, and some similar themes, it lacks the personality and melodic qualities of the first game's soundtrack. Still, it's nice to have another game in the Cyberia series, at least to experience the unique sensations of the first game for a little longer - even if in an inferior overall presentation. And if you like to immerse yourself in early PC gaming atmospheres, then Cyberia 2 allows for plenty of that, too. I'm giving Cyberia 2 one bonus star in my rating, because the first Cyberia is just that awesome.

9 gamers found this review helpful
Cyberia
Created on 01 February, 2015 19:09
Cyberia

Amazing game, one of 1994's best

Cyberia is a highly unique game, with fun adventure-style puzzles to solve, exciting flight combat levels, and a continually progressing story that doesn't aim to repeat the same experience twice from start to finish. It's like the game only knows how to go forward, and knows how to do it very well. It also has some very good music, and an awesome end to its adventure. I played this game in its day on a sub-average 486 SX-33, without problems, and my friends played it on their 486 66, and another on their luxurious Pentium 133. None of us encountered any performance problem, and I don't recall ever having technical issues. A below review claiming that PC's from 1989 couldn't run the game is absolutely ridiculous, as the minimum requirement of 486 33mhz didn't exist yet. In 1994, when the game released, a 486 33mhz was not rare, and was sub-average - Pentiums had already been released a year earlier. Unfortunately, the ratings and reviews for Cyberia are going to be somewhat skewed, by the little boys hopping on a GameInformer Super Replay bandwagon that purposely set out to disparage and mock the game by deliberately playing it worse than humanly possible and acting, yes, purely acting as if they weren't the screw ups rather than the game itself. GameInformer did this game a greatly dishonest disservice, and the average rating of 4 stars for this game, despite the irreverent GI noise pollution, is testament that this is actually a great game, both in its original day and still now.

49 gamers found this review helpful